I'm annoyed that blogger won't let me use my gmail account for this blog. I'd like to streamline everything into gmail. Doesn't that make them happy? Maybe I'll start a new blog using my gmail address. notgonnabealawyer is pretty far behind my thoughts these days, but if I stop using this blog does the experience really continue unabated?
Anyways, I'm feeling pretty good right now despite the fact that I've basically blown off reading the book I was assigned for class tomorrow and read book reviews instead. Last week was a really stressful week full of grading, and there's something empowering about reclaiming my life in a small way by reading things that interest me instead of a book that doesn't, or really is so heavily steeped in postmodern gender theory that I don't want to stretch my poor brain enough to read it right now.
I'm taking a class this semester called "American Lives of the Word." It's a class on the writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Joseph Smith (founder of Mormonism) and John Brown (radical abolitionist who led the raid on Harper's Ferry). What I love about this class is that we get to read actual primary sources. History seminars are deplorably lacking in these exercises most of the time, and that annoys me, because the reason I got into history in the first place was love of primary sources (well really love of dead philosophers, but in history we call those primaries).
Anyway, Emerson is incredibly interesting so far. We read one of his pieces called "The American Scholar." (Presented to the Phi Beta Kappa Society in 1837. I am also a member of PBK. This connection makes me happy. I am a historian.) Anyway, I found the piece inspiring because Emerson highly advocates creativity. This is part of the scholar's vocation. He even says, "Man Thinking must not be subdued by his instruments. Books are for the scholar's idle times. When he can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be wasted in other men's transcripts of their readings..." Books are for idle times! I read all the time!!
I've never considered myself a particularly creative person. I'm (intensely) analytical, so my 'creativity' usually comes in the form of picking apart and putting together ideas, the more abstract, the better. I also like to analyze people, an amateur psychologist of sorts. My point is that I've never expected to have the next big idea. I still don't, but, damn it, I shouldn't give up trying to be creative in my own way.
I miss my undergraduate years for this a bit. As I discussed in my last post, I was a little bit of a sadly introspective person (now I'm still introspective, but hopefully less sad), but I was always thinking about something. There are weeks now in which I feel I haven't been inspired or so lost in my ideas that I accidentally walk past people I know. Maybe there's something to be said for being more grounded. After all, I live more than I used to, and that's an important part of Emerson's formula for the scholar as well. Nevertheless, I've got to do something more. Be somehow creative. I dunno.
I'm not saying that I'm thinking of giving up books, but I am reminded of the importance of taking time to think about things, not just to consume book after book, getting lost in a swirl of meaningless striving. These thoughts are very amorphous and maybe I'll come down off the Emerson high and return to my usual skepticism. But, for the moment, I am challenged and inspired. I think Emerson couldn't be more pleased with my response himself.